![eboostr review eboostr review](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/36/f6/d4/36f6d4677c78a9a9b34d9bf807cb9337.png)
You'd find out how much RAM you use in your regular usage and then choose extra RAM (and a margin) for the cache. I'd suggest a system with 12 to 16 GB of RAM. You can have two-tiered caching to both SSD and RAM. It will cache to SSD (including NVME), and it will cache to RAM. You need to decide on any number of configurations. PrimoCache does block-level caching of a slower source disk or medium to a faster one. You would have to copy programs or data to it before running the programs or accessing the data. And I figure if you can create a dual-boot system that works flawlessly with prudent caching choices with no problems and only the desired benefits - "it's good."Ĭlick to expand.No - the RAM disk program converts memory into a storage mechanism. If you plan to cache a drive that has offline writes, you will run into trouble unless you only use session-specific RAM-cache that is not available for the next boot time, and obviously you wouldn't use SSD-caching for a drive that has off-line writes.Īs for any real "troubles," there haven't been any except for a foolish experience with the offline write problem and another with dual-OS caching volumes on the same device. Ram-cache can be saved and prefetched through restarts or reboots. The larger the SSD you use, the larger the block-size recommended, or you will begin to consume large amounts of RAM in overhead. But there's no doubt that the SSD-cache matters. This will supposedly be changed with version 3.0.
![eboostr review eboostr review](https://www.pasmag.com/images/stories/1109/1109Tech/Turbosmart-11.09-web-images/ebs_facefront_opt.jpeg)
This is because it fills the cache stealthily when the system is idling, and the results of a benchmark simply won't register. You cannot measure its impact in benchmarks! But - you can feel it after the cache loads up. Definitely not a requirement for a single workstation or gaming system.Īs to the SSD-cache again.
#Eboostr review pro#
Some people with enormous tasks and data configure 128GB of RAM, and even use a single 960 Pro for SSD-cache. I haven't upgraded to 2x16 32GB yet, because I seem to have plenty with 16. The SSD cache works with RAM-caching, which is also a nice feature if you have some extra RAM to use. Or the same combination cached to a common RAM-cache (or separate ones), or a combination of RAM and SSD-caching. You can cache a combination of AHCI, RAID and multiple drives under a single SSD cache. But that shouldn't be a concern for the OP.
![eboostr review eboostr review](https://images.thdstatic.com/productImages/dd039cbf-b6d9-4674-8050-65162994851a/svn/tallas-shallow-well-pumps-d-eboost-wifi-1100-45-115-120v-60hz-64_1000.jpg)
In my case, I'm only using the SSD-cache feature for a single OS right now. I THINK they have to be on separate SSDs, and creating separate caching volumes for each OS on the same SSD could be a problem. According to the tech-support, one SHOULD be able to maintain SSD cache disks for each OS. In my case, there are some options and constraints that affect a dual-boot system.
#Eboostr review Pc#
It's a lifetime license, so the single PC option is not a lot of money spent or wasted. You should be easily able to cache a RAID array.
#Eboostr review trial#
I could speculate about demand for the product as it might affect such an initially tantalizing trial period. It used to have a 90-day free trial, but that's amended now to 60 days.